Vol 6 Chapter 2821: Level 4 advanced automatic driving

Entering November, just as Wu Hao was putting his experience into the aerospace and lunar exploration project, a piece of news made him have to put down the work at hand.

After the continuous efforts of relevant departments, car companies, and scientific research institutes, the first domestic L4-level intelligent driving regulation draft for comments was officially released.

This is the first L4-level high-level intelligent driving regulation officially released in so many years, and before that, the L3-level automatic driving regulation released in 2009 has actually been used.

In fact, this set of L3-level autonomous driving regulations has been perfected, but after so many years, it has become increasingly unable to keep up with the needs of society, the industry, and the public.

Therefore, this set of L4-level high-level intelligent driving regulations was conceived. Try to formulate this set of regulations, Haoyu Technology is also an important participant. When this set of L4-level high-level intelligent driving regulations was proposed, the relevant departments invited many companies to participate, and as an important technology supplier in the field of intelligent driving technology, Haoyu Technology should also become one of the framers .

It is actually not easy to formulate relevant regulations on L4-level high-level intelligent driving regulations, because there are many controversial things in them. The first is to define the vehicle liability and compensation issues.

The L3 level has regulations, that is, how long the driver's hand cannot leave the steering wheel. This also means that during the entire l3 automatic driving process, the driver is actually involved, so the responsibility can be defined.

However, L4-level high-level intelligent driving regulations require the participation of the driver. The vehicle automatically makes autonomous decisions, and the driver needs to perform any operations, especially relying on the support of road information data that can be updated in real time to realize automatic pick-up and return of the car. , automatic formation cruise, automatic obstacle avoidance and other real scenes of travel, etc.

That also means that the driver cannot be completely liberated from driving, and the entire driving process is not controlled by the vehicle's autonomous regression decision-making.

In this way, there is no problem with the driver in the whole driving process. The driver controls the vehicle and also interferes with the driving of the vehicle. In essence, there is no difference between the driver and the passenger.

Yes, yes, autonomous driving technology is a standardized and standardized driving technology. Due to the restrictions of regulations, all driving logic of autonomous driving technology complies with the requirements of various regulations.

It also proves that self-driving technology will effectively help drivers reduce car accidents.

Around those issues, people from all walks of life have been arguing for several years, and finally, after a few discussions, they came up with a more feasible solution.

Therefore, there will be some traffic violations in autonomous driving technology, because those laws and regulations are input into the system and are surmountable unless human intervention.

So in that regard, all parties are also actively looking for a solution, and in the end the two sides retreated and compromised in that regard. First of all, the owner of the vehicle, as the owner of the vehicle, the driver, has no jurisdiction and supervision, so he bears certain responsibilities.

Secondly, it is not about the moral choice faced by self-driving cars at that time, how to make the right decision is also a problem worthy of attention. For example, when a self-driving car needs to decide between two options, such as avoiding pedestrians or protecting passengers, which should it choose? That needs to take into account many moral factors, such as the value of human life, public interests, social justice, etc., which requires more detailed and in-depth moral planning and design for the development of self-driving cars.

And those under the self-driving vehicle exist, unless there is a problem with the car's self-driving system, or there is a problem with the sensor, there will be a misjudgment and an accident.

As for the choice of vehicle driving, it has also been defined in great detail. For example, in line with the principle of emergency avoidance, when the vehicle encounters safety, it is a good idea to protect the dangers of the members of the vehicle after endangering the lives of other personnel.

However, judging from the fact that the implementation of L3-level regulations is so young, the controversy in that area is actually relatively large, and there have been no minor disputes.

That's right, that doesn't mean that there is no problem with L4-level automatic driving, that's right. In fact, under the low-level automatic driving technology of the L4 level, there is no fully automatic driving technology of the L5 level.

In this way, once the vehicle has an accident, who should be responsible? The owner of the vehicle, the driver, the car manufacturer, or the insurance company will settle the claims.

In fact, it is also in line with the logical behavior of real driving. When real driving encounters such problems, most of the best in the world are to protect their own dangers.

As for the driver, because the field of view inside the car is relatively limited, there are blind spots for observation. Coupled with the driver's difficulty and distraction, the reaction ability is different, so it is very difficult to cause an accident.

As a car company, the car company must bear full responsibility if it is caused by technical problems, and it must be a traffic accident caused by technical problems, and the car company will not have certain responsibilities.

However, in special cases, when the vehicle is started, the system will perform a pre-check on the entire system and sensors, and if there is a problem with the vehicle, the system will remind you in time.

Coupled with the support of on-board sensors, UU Kanshu www.uukanshu.com can make it unable to perceive changes in the surrounding environment in real time, so as to make early predictions, so that many accidents cannot be avoided.

In the case of encountering the dangers of other personnel and members of the vehicle, priority should be given to protecting the dangers of passengers in the vehicle, and the United States and China should minimize the harm to their personnel.

Of course, there will also be problems such as performance degradation caused by old vehicle systems and hardware. However, that problem can also be solved, and that aspect of the inspection problem cannot be added to the previous maintenance of the vehicle and the annual inspection of the vehicle, which is not conducive to avoiding some problems caused by the old vehicle system and hardware.

Of course, neither the driver nor the car company is responsible for the insurance. Compared with special companies, the insurance premiums for cars without automatic driving will be lower, because the premiums for automatic driving are covered outside.

First of all, regarding the division of vehicle responsibilities for autonomous driving, in order to push back the promotion and popularization of autonomous driving technology, it cannot bring together fewer people.

The smallest difference from the L4 level is that it requires the driver to cooperate with any operation to achieve all-weather, all-regional automatic driving, and can cope with changes in environmental climate and geographical location. The driver can focus on rest or other work.

And there are no records showing that before the promulgation of L3-level regulations, and fewer and fewer cars equipped with L3-level automatic driving technology, the incidence of vehicle accidents across the country has shown a significant increase.

Of course, there is still controversy about that matter, after all, there is no dispute about choosing this. As for that aspect, the terms of interpretation are also very eloquent.

That also means that there will be no driver under the vehicle, or that the driver is just a backup solution. The entire vehicle is not controlled by an automatic driving system, and it cannot realize all-weather, automatic driving in a global environment.